Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Gwyneth Lewis ‘Spiderings’ Ian Thomson ‘Fires were started: Tallinn, 1944’ Adrian May ‘Traditionalism and Tradition’ Judith Herzberg ‘Poems’ translated by Margitt Lehbert Horatio Morpurgo ‘What is a Book?’
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This article is taken from PN Review 244, Volume 45 Number 2, November - December 2018.

on Anthony Rudolf

Anthony Rudolf’s Silent Conversations
Frederic Raphael
I FIRST, AND LAST, read Elias Canetti’s 1935 novel, Die Blendung, under its English title, Auto-da-fe, in the early 1950s in Cambridge. My adhesive memory is of a man whose living space is voluminously pre-empted by print. Dr Peter Kien adheres to an obsessive version of Logan Pearsall Smith’s dictum, ‘People say that life’s the thing, but I prefer reading’. Kien’s housekeeper Therese is seemingly the dedicated guardian of his library, the biggest in bookish Vienna; but when the bibliomaniac marries her, she becomes a termagant who eventually deprives him of contact with his one true love.

Since the principal victims of the original Inquisition’s auto-da-fe were Jews, it calls for no great wit to see Kien’s fate as emblematic of the impending destiny of the People of the Book whom ‘Aryan’ racial vanity – the inferiority complex in Boss uniform – would eliminate from the central European scene which they had done so much to enlighten. Canetti was the augur of the imminent collapse of the delusion that literacy is a reliable barrier against barbarism (music, as Wagner proved, makes no such promises). Nazi ‘philosophers’ and Stalinist ideologists soon established that addled reason and parodic scholarship could supply a warrant for mass murder. Straight philosophers, Kant and Schopenhauer among them, had already flirted with the systematic anti­Semitism which most German historians, Theodor Mommsen not least, repudiated. Karl Marx proved his emancipation from antique loyalties by a show of detached disgust with ‘the huckster race’.

Socialist anti-Semitism derives from these lethal schematics. Does ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image