Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Hal Coase 'Ochre Pitch' Gregory Woods 'On Queerness' Kirsty Gunn 'On Risk! Carl Phillips' Galina Rymbu 'What I Haven't Written' translated by Sasha Dugdale Gabriel Josipovici 'No More Stories' Valerie Duff-Strautmann 'Anne Carson's Wrong Norma'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PN Review 276
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 233, Volume 43 Number 3, January - February 2017.

Cover of Jonathan Ellis (ed), Letter Writing Among Poets: From William Wordsworth to Elizabeth Bishop
Ruth HawthornAn Intercourse with Ghosts
Jonathan Ellis (ed), Letter Writing Among Poets: From William Wordsworth to Elizabeth Bishop Edinburgh University Press, 2016 Reviewed by Ruth Hawthorn
THE DEMISE OF LETTER WRITING has been pronounced prematurely on numerous occasions over the last two centuries; the penny post, telegrams and telephones were all wrongly accused of sounding its death knell. More recently the internet and the ephemeral communication it facilitates has been decried as the final proverbial nail. As one commentator mourns, ‘Inky manuscripts contain insights that can be lost forever to the backspace key.’ While letters may not yet be completely extinct, as Jonathan Ellis observes, ‘However one dates the “great age of letter-writing” there seems little doubt that it is in the past.’ Ending, appropriately, with Ellis’s own haunting essay about the last letters of John Keats, Elizabeth Bishop and Ted Hughes, Letter Writing Among Poets reads as an elegy for the form. What emerges in many of the essays collected here is a sense of letters’ uncanniness, and Kafka’s view of letters as ‘an intercourse with ghosts’ permeates the collection. The absent presence of the letter-writing voice (analogous with the lyric voice) and letters’ ability to vividly recall the voice of the dead is commonly remarked upon, but, Ellis observes, this also works the other way: the addressee ‘is ghostly too’. The necessary lag between writing and reading means that, as Angela Leighton suggests, ‘there is a potential dead letter at the heart of every missive’.

There is some speculation on new media and how the role of letters is being supplanted or transformed in the age of near-instantaneous correspondence. Hermione Lee comments, for example, that ‘No-one ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image