PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Subha Mukherji Dying and Living with De la Mare Carl Phillips Fall Colors and other poems Alex Wylie The Bureaucratic Sublime: on the secret joys of contemporary poetry Marilyn Hacker Montpeyroux Sonnets David Herman Memories of Raymond Williams
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This article is taken from PN Review 4, Volume 4 Number 4, July - September 1978.

Poetry and Polemic Michael Vince

DONALD DAVIE's editorial in PNR 2, which contains so many assertions and appealing generalizations, yet steers its way to safe ground ('This is dangerous talk, of course'), prompts me to generalize a little further, in a positive sense, I hope.

Caricaturing the roles of the party leader and of the press, his vision of political life seems itself to take on the quality of journalistic fantasy, the Daily Herald not included; 'different calibre' . . . 'more personal weight' . . .: his politics suggest a drama of great figures, without any very definite examples. Is this to be our education in the nation's history? Nor do we get much sense of politics other than the relationship, which sounds like an equation, between the intelligence of the electorate, all or few, and the worth of the party leaders, including their indifference to 'literary and poetic intelligence'. And we are left wondering, perhaps, whether the equation works both ways; do our politicians get the electorate they deserve?

Apparently the politics he is discussing excludes the majority of people whose lack of education he deplores. What he is really discussing seems to be the idea of intelligence, defined as above, with a few heavy-handed side-swipes at the popular notion of technology, and W. H. Smith. Democracy requires the vision of intelligent men, but also the vision of a certain kind of education; where the electorate lacks this, politics is laughable. What we are not told is precisely ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image