PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Colm Toibin on Thom Gunn's Letters Allice Hiller and Sasha Dugdale in conversation David Herman on the life of Edward W. Said Jena Schmitt on Hope Mirrlees Brian Morton: Now the Trees
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This review is taken from PN Review 18, Volume 7 Number 4, March - April 1981.

BETA-PLUS P. R. King, Nine Contemporary Poets: A Critical Introduction (Methuen) £3.50

In his Preface, P. R. King states his purpose as follows: 'If this book helps in some small part to encourage readers to make their own assessment of these poets or, more importantly, encourages them to read or reread the poetry, I shall consider my task worthwhile. 'That is awkwardly put; but let me say straight away that if Nine Contemporary Poets does have that effect, then my reservations about the book won't matter. However, P. R. King is tautologically described as 'Lecturer in Education at Loughborough University' (which I assume means that he teaches teachers) and his book comes in Methuen's established and often excellent University Paperbacks series: it's likely, therefore, that what he has to say will filter through to more than a few classrooms, essays, exam answers and so on. His book may well appear to possess more authority than its author modestly claims for it, and it must be judged accordingly.

It is, for a start, mistitled. It should be called Six Contemporary Poets: A Critical Introduction, since the last three of the nine (Douglas Dunn, Tom Paulin, Paul Mills) aren't critically introduced: they introduce themselves, in Paulin's case by way of an interview, in the other two cases by lengthy written statements presented without authorial interruption. The inclusion of these three self-introductions is baffling since King claims in his Preface that he would have liked to have dealt with the work of Peter Porter and R. S. Thomas 'if space had permitted'. ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image