Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Gwyneth Lewis ‘Spiderings’ Ian Thomson ‘Fires were started: Tallinn, 1944’ Adrian May ‘Traditionalism and Tradition’ Judith Herzberg ‘Poems’ translated by Margitt Helbert Horatio Morpurgo ‘What is a Book?’
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PN Review 276
PN Review Substack

This article is taken from PN Review 23, Volume 8 Number 3, January - February 1982.

Notes on Sylvia Townsend Warner's Poetry Martin Seymour-Smith

It is right that there should be a Collected Poems of Sylvia Town-send Warner. It is not that all her poems are successful: there is a high proportion of failures. But they are nearly always interesting, and this applies even to the most derivative and clumsy. Many who have read her novels are unaware that she wrote poetry. Indeed, odd in every way that she too deliberately was, she leaves the impression that she did not very much care whether she wrote poetry or not. I think she felt like that at least when she was not writing it. This, in an age when 'greatness' and 'achievement' (properly written up by 'critics') are the aim of even poetasters, is a positive gain. She is in a way a more rewarding writer than Ruth Pitter, than Kathleen Raine, than Elizabeth Bishop-than even Marianne Moore.

It might seem that I am trying to be annoying-and to over-value Warner. But it is simply that I am not writing in the familiar pseudo-critical ambience. Living literature cannot be treated as a collection of specimens categorised in hierarchies: the earnest taxonomist is playing at literature, and is called, in our century, a literary professional, or a critic, or a teacher. You could not teach Pitter, but Bishop and Moore are taught, and Raine is one about whom you are obliged to have an opinion. So that it is nice to have Warner: one sees that she did, as it happens, develop. To ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image