This interview is taken from PN Review 40, Volume 11 Number 2, November - December 1984.
in conversation with James Fenton
References in the text are to James Fenton's The Memory of War and Children in Exile (Penguin, 1983).
James Fenton - I think the question of influence is misunderstood. People say and think - and probably rightly - that one is less a poet the more one owes to a previous writer. People haven't always felt that. And I didn't feel that at the time I started writing. I was perfectly happy to imitate Auden at times and to follow what seemed to me a possible programme he had set for poets, a possible area of interest they might include in their poetry, a possible way of writing a line- those long lines which, when I started writing, very few people used, so they always identified this as a late Audenesque line. It seemed to me that Auden had invented a certain kind of discursive poem which could range over a huge number of topics or areas of intellectual interest. Nobody had taken up this possibility he had offered. So it's not a question of being unable to get Auden out of your blood-stream. Not like the effect of reading Dylan Thomas! It is a question of going to school with a master and beginning that way. I think that is quite a reasonable, genuine approach. Of course critics are able to say: ...
Grevel Lindop - Your work has often been linked with your admiration for Auden. How important has his influence been?
James Fenton - I think the question of influence is misunderstood. People say and think - and probably rightly - that one is less a poet the more one owes to a previous writer. People haven't always felt that. And I didn't feel that at the time I started writing. I was perfectly happy to imitate Auden at times and to follow what seemed to me a possible programme he had set for poets, a possible area of interest they might include in their poetry, a possible way of writing a line- those long lines which, when I started writing, very few people used, so they always identified this as a late Audenesque line. It seemed to me that Auden had invented a certain kind of discursive poem which could range over a huge number of topics or areas of intellectual interest. Nobody had taken up this possibility he had offered. So it's not a question of being unable to get Auden out of your blood-stream. Not like the effect of reading Dylan Thomas! It is a question of going to school with a master and beginning that way. I think that is quite a reasonable, genuine approach. Of course critics are able to say: ...
The page you have requested is restricted to subscribers only. Please enter your username and password and click on 'Continue'.
If you have forgotten your username and password, please enter the email address you used when you joined. Your login details will then be emailed to the address specified.
If you are not a subscriber and would like to enjoy the 286 issues containing over 11,500 poems, articles, reports, interviews and reviews, why not subscribe to the website today?
If you have forgotten your username and password, please enter the email address you used when you joined. Your login details will then be emailed to the address specified.
If you are not a subscriber and would like to enjoy the 286 issues containing over 11,500 poems, articles, reports, interviews and reviews, why not subscribe to the website today?