Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Gwyneth Lewis ‘Spiderings’ Ian Thomson ‘Fires were started: Tallinn, 1944’ Adrian May ‘Traditionalism and Tradition’ Judith Herzberg ‘Poems’ translated by Margitt Helbert Horatio Morpurgo ‘What is a Book?’
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PN Review 276
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 192, Volume 36 Number 4, March - April 2010.

IDEAS OF ORDER The Georgians 1901-1930, edited by Merryn Williams (Shoestring Press) £13.95

In fictional terms, the Georgians might be bookended between Howards End (1910) and Brideshead Revisited (1945). They were briefly modern enough to have appealed to the forward- thinking Schlegel sisters of Forster’s novel and yet by the mid-twenties their anthologies were part of the ‘meagre and commonplace’ book collection in the Oxford rooms of Waugh’s Charles Ryder.

The brief vogue of the Georgians as the spirit of the age came in five anthologies edited by Edward Marsh between 1912 and 1922 (the year of The Waste Land). They sold extremely well, being dedicated to the proposition that the busy reader might need assistance in finding what was new in the poetry world. However, after the unimaginable devastation of the First World War, the American modernists took over. It was an instance, in T.S. Eliot’s ominous phrase, of ‘the correction of taste’. Individual careers continued to blossom (Graves, Blunden) and the War Poets were to become iconic, but the ‘Georgians’ were passé.

The salient point to remember, however, as Merryn Williams makes clear in the introduction to his welcome new anthology, is that in their time the Georgians were considered very modern - their poems even ‘ugly’. Contributor Lascelles Abercrombie wrote of the first anthology in 1912, that they had ‘completely broken away from Victorianism in manner as well as in matter’ and Williams explains that the poets ‘experimented with verse drama, free verse and half-rhyme; they were willing to tackle several subjects which had been ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image