PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
Digital Access to PN Review
Access the latest issues, plus back issues of PN Review with Exact Editions For PN Review subscribers: access the PN Review digital archive via the Exact Editions app Exactly or the Exact Editions website, you will first need to know your PN Review ID number. read more
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Monthly Carcanet Books
Next Issue Thomas Kinsella in conversation Jeffrey Wainwright comes to grips with St Chad Hsien Min Toh gives us a Korean perspective Iain Bamforth on Lou and Fritz: Sensible Shoes meets Starstruck Judith Bishop on Love and Self-Understanding in an Algorythmic Age

This review is taken from PN Review 191, Volume 36 Number 3, January - February 2010.

QUEST FOR IDENTITY STEFANIA MICHELLUCCI, The Poetry of Thom Gunn: A Critical Study, translated by Jill Franks (McFarland) £35.95 ($39.95)

A single-author study of Thom Gunn’s poetry has been long overdue. Indeed, of all his literary contemporaries (‘Movement’ poets or otherwise), Gunn is the only one to have neither a monograph nor a biography published about him in English. This is a profound discrepancy that does not correspond to the number of times that Gunn’s poetry is analysed in dual- or triple-author studies, in edited collections, or in the large number of high quality articles available. Even so, very few of these articles or chapters deal with Gunn’s poetry as a whole - from the poetry of Cambridge, Fighting Terms (1954) and earlier, to that of Los Angeles, Boss Cupid (2000). Stefania Michellucci’s book The Poetry of Thom Gunn: A Critical Study attempts to redress this imbalance. The book’s ambition is to include all of Gunn, and, although it promotes itself as a critical study of the work of the poet, its trajectory, as Clive Wilmer highlights in his perceptive introduction, is largely to engage with ‘the quest for identity’ in Gunn’s poetry.

This broad critical trajectory brings with it, it seems, certain cultural and biographical complications. The book opens with an exposition of ‘The Movement’, with little mention of Gunn for the first ten pages. Once Gunn is mentioned (in a subsection ‘Thom Gunn and the Movement’) the material of the preceding pages is relegated to a ‘legitimate point of departure’ for Gunn’s poetic, no more. It is interesting that Michellucci should choose to open the ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image