PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Kei Millerthe Fat Black Woman
In Praise of the Fat Black Woman & Volume

(PN Review 241)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Next Issue Jen Schmitt on Ekphrasis Rachel Hadas on Text and Pandemic Kirsty Gunn Essaying two Jee Leong Koh Palinodes in the Voice of my Dead Father Maureen Mclane Correspondent Breeze
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
Monthly Carcanet Books
PN Review Blog

This review is taken from PN Review 53, Volume 13 Number 3, January - February 1987.

THE GREAT GAME John Haffenden, Novelists in Interview (Methuen) £11.95, £5.95 pb.

If 'critic' is the sharpest term of abuse in Waiting for Godot, then I wonder what Beckett/Estragon could make, if provoked, of the literary interviewer. So often this itinerant critic, in pursuit of that elusive point where life and art can be seen to meet, traps his subjects in a web of rationalizations and self-inflicted platitudes. Thanks to John Haffenden's sensitive questioning, informed attention to particular novels, and direct and un-toadyish manner, which gives a genuinely conversational tone to these pieces, this book is different. There is even, at the point where Haffenden persists with Golding over his refusal to discuss Darkness Visible, a fictional (Jamesian?) plot in embryo. No doubt the book will be trawled for easy seminar fodder, or highjacked for a literary version of Trivial Pursuit. (Thus: which writer has a fig tree outside his house? Which has a Punch puppet?) Still, as Angela Carter points out, curiosity can serve a moral function, and respect for a writer's work provokes a twin respect for his/her comments on it - with Russell Hoban's warning that some interviewers' questions are 'like asking the eggshells to explain the omelette'.

Can we (should we) expect anything in common between these fourteen novelists of the 1980s? One important qualification is that four of them - Bradbury, Golding, Murdoch, and Pritchett - made their reputations in the 1950s, or earlier, and differences between the decades do show here. But clearly, Haffenden's choices are more than an arm's length away from ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image