Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Gwyneth Lewis ‘Spiderings’ Ian Thomson ‘Fires were started: Tallinn, 1944’ Adrian May ‘Traditionalism and Tradition’ Judith Herzberg ‘Poems’ translated by Margitt Lehbert Horatio Morpurgo ‘What is a Book?’
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 59, Volume 14 Number 3, January - February 1988.


In June 1937, the meeting of 'the intellectuals' - 'Los Intelectuales', it sounds better in Spanish than in English - which took place in Valencia, and in Madrid and Barcelona, was called by our Spanish colleagues in order to demonstrate support for the cause of the Spanish Republic.

Fifty years later, the writers of the manifesto prepared for the present Congress point out that they do not wish this meeting to be a resurrection of the past. They want us to recognize our mistakes and to consider what role the intellectual should play in the world of today. They even seem to want us to redefine what we mean by 'Los Intelectuales'.

In 1937 what brought the intellectuals together in supporting anti-Fascism was that in Europe the Fascist or Nazi dictators had deprived intellectuals of freedom of self-expression. By imposing censorship, imprisoning intellectuals or driving them into exile, burning or banning books by writers whose opinions or race they took exception, the Fascist dictators themselves defined anti-Fascism. If one was not already 'political', to be an anti-Fascist was to be a victim, or to take the side of victims. Herbert Read, the English poet and critic, described anti-Fascism as 'the politics of the non-political': a stance forced on to those who were simply defending their own or others' rights to express themselves, even in the creation of non-political work. Thomas Mann remarked in the 1930s, 'In our time the destiny of man presents its meaning ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image