PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Jamie OsbornIn conversation with Sasha Dugdale
(PN Review 240)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
OUP PNR 246 Banner
Monthly Carcanet Books
Next Issue Alex Wong embarks on Ausonius's Moselle Christine Blackwell recalls Jonas Mekas Lives of Graves, Trilling and Curnow visited New poems by Lisa Kelly and Jodie Hollander Andy Croft on the 'poetry industry'

This review is taken from PN Review 65, Volume 15 Number 3, January - February 1989.

DID WOMEN HAVE A RENAISSANCE? Stevie Davies, The Idea of Woman in Renaissance Literature. The Feminine Reclaimed (Harvester) £28.50
Jonathan Goldberg, Voice Terminal Echo. Postmodernism and English Renaissance Texts (Methuen) £7.95 pb.
Margaret W. Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan and Nancy J. Vickers, Rewriting the Renaissance. The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, in series Women in Culture and Society, ed. Catherine R. Stimpson (University of Chicago Press) £39.95, £12.75 pb.
 
For some time now, historians seem to have been finding the term 'Renaissance' uncomfortable. Hesitating a little, they have taken refuge under the banner of either 'the late middle ages' or 'early modern Europe'. They have tried to shrug off the stultifying view of the Renaissance which saw in it the Origins of Individualism, or the Birth of Modern Man. So when feminist historian Joan Kelly Gadol asked 'Did Women have a Renaissance?', suggesting that women's history may necessitate a different periodisation from traditional, male history, her question could resonate with many 'Renaissance' historians as well as with feminists. Historians who would not describe themselves as feminist were pleased to jettison a concept which made little sense of the lives of most fourteenth and fifteenth century Europeans.

But, as the boldly designed blue cover of the collection Rewriting the Renaissance proclaims, the Renaissance is back - and with no apologies - as a central subject in European cultural history. Indeed, it figures in the titles of all three books. Only now its location has wandered a little: it refers chiefly to sixteenth and seventeenth century English writing, though it can include sixteenth century France, and Italy and Germany between 1500 and 1700.

Feminism - or at least an engagement with phallocentrism - has been central to this reclaiming of the Renaissance, as each of these three books in their different ways testify. Stevie Davies seeks to recover 'the feminine' in sixteenth/seventeenth century literature, exploring female ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image