Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Hal Coase 'Ochre Pitch' Gregory Woods 'On Queerness' Kirsty Gunn 'On Risk! Carl Phillips' Galina Rymbu 'What I Haven't Written' translated by Sasha Dugdale Gabriel Josipovici 'No More Stories' Valerie Duff-Strautmann 'Anne Carson's Wrong Norma'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PN Review 276
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 69, Volume 16 Number 1, September - October 1989.

A HUMAN INVENTION G.A. Wells, The origin of language: aspects of the discussion from Condillac to Wundt (La Salle, Open Court)

The purpose of this book is to defend the view that language is a human invention. Invention in the sense between discovery and contrivance: a resource originally stumbled upon by accident but then perceived to answer a need previously unfilled. Not all of language at once, of course, but bit by bit. It would be better to speak of origins.

The history of the question is not edifying. Enlightenment philosophers were constrained to present the view in ways that would not conflict with notions derived from Genesis. Well into the nineteenth century the origin of human language was held to be recent and supernatural. Comparative philologists who thought language 'natural' supposed it to have developed in accordance with laws immutable as nature's. Its origin was embarrassing, a problem fortunately intractable since no evidence could be produced, and the question was dropped from academic debate. Human curiosity was not thereby extinguished but emergent sciences like psychology and anthropology had to devise new approaches. Only lately has the subject been readmitted to rational discussion. The absence of a chronological framework like Darwinism found in geology still hinders liaison with other historical studies.

How then can the question be approached? The habits of other animals, especially those closest to man, are inspected for clues to early and effective means of communication. Fossil finds establish evolutionary changes in cranial capacity and the shape of organs used for speech. Observations are made of the alternative methods adopted when people are ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image