Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This article is taken from PN Review 75, Volume 17 Number 1, September - October 1990.

Post-modernism, Craft, and the Market for Poetry Donald Davie

THE EARLIEST ATTACK on 'consumerism' may have been Ralph Glasser's The New High Priesthood (1967). Certainly its author seems to think so, opining without false modesty that his book was 'probably ahead of its time'.1 In it, Glasser says, he set out to show 'how the persuasion machine - advertising, PR, press and broadcasting, the design of products and their presentation, the 'marketing message' - was now the major influence in moulding people's beliefs, and instilled a shallow, infantile view of life.' An American historian, Jerry Z. Muller, would not be easily persuaded.2 Muller finds 'gloomers and doomers' - as he calls them - as far back in history as Justus Möser of Westphalia (1720-1794). In that perspective Glasser, no less than 'cultural critics from Vance Packard and Herbert Marcuse through Christopher Lasch and Barbara Ehrenreich', can only seem a Johnny-come-lately, rehearsing a time-honoured jeremiad. But of course Muller is making only a debating point when he puts on a level Möser's dislike of door-to-door peddlers in the 18th century with modern apprehensions about 24 hour commercial television. The principle may be the same, but today's peddlers command so much more technology that the difference of the scale must make a qualitative difference. And no one who observes the economic behaviour of his family, his friends and neighbours, indeed his own behaviour in the market-place, will think the question set to rest by Muller's appeal to the Wall Street Journal Centennial Study assuring us that 'the correlation between advertising ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image