PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
PNR266 Now Available
The latest issue of PN Review is now available to read online. read more
Most Read... Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
M. Wynn ThomasThe Other Side of the Hedge
(PN Review 239)
Jamie OsbornIn conversation with Sasha Dugdale
(PN Review 240)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing ‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing
(PN Review 236)
Next Issue Stav Poleg Running Between Languages Jeffrey Meyers on Mr W.H. (Auden) Miles Burrows The Critic as Cleaning Lady Timothy Ades translates Brecht, Karen Leeder translates Ulrike Almut Sandig
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This review is taken from PN Review 79, Volume 17 Number 5, May - June 1991.

THE PHANTOM OF THE OEUVRE Michel Leiris, Aurora, translated and introduced by Anna Warby (Atlas Books) £5.99

Of the three categories into which the work of the late Michel Leiris naturally, though by no means systematically, divides - Surrealism, ethnography and autobiography - Aurora offers us access principally to the first, with only a few scattered indicators of the interests that were to make him one of France's most original and challenging post-war writers. Like others who, within a few years of its birth, seceded from the orthodox Surrealism defined by André Breton, Leiris claimed in later life he had never abandoned the movement's most important doctrines, which helps to explain why he was ambivalent in his feelings towards Aurora, a dawn of sorts but a compromised one, and a compromise he could only acknowledge publicly after confronting himself head on from the belatedly 'mature' perspective of L'age d'homme (Manhood). Though heavily freighted with the fictional baggage which Leiris was subsequently to disavow, Aurora - written in the late 1920s, but left unpublished until 1946 - became the test of a hyperbolic commitment to 'the maximum of lucidity and sincerity', and at the same time a cultivation of its subsoil, an exposé of sorts in spite of its traffic with obscurity and rhapsodic rhetoric. In a brief essay on the Elizabethan magus John Dee, published at about the time Aurora was begun, Leiris describes the 'almost magical action' that the alchemist's Monas hieroglyphica 'exercises on the spirit', albeit not one without its 'profoundly troubling' aspects. In the late 1920s Leiris would scarcely have permitted himself ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image