Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 83, Volume 18 Number 3, January - February 1992.

Raymond TallisOPEN BRACKETS Colin Falck, Myth Truth and Literature: Towards a true post-modernism (CUP) £10.95

The meta-mythology of myth has dominated literary and cultural analysis too long and some of us are sick and tired of the dead leaves falling from The Golden Bough. And 'post-modernism' is a term encountered so often that semantic satiation has drained it of meaning. So a book that includes 'myth' in its title and promises 'a true post-modernism' in its subtitle awakens limited expectation of pleasure and illumination. Don't be put off: this short treatise is an interesting exploration of the relations between poetry and language at large and between language and the fundamental properties of human consciousness.

Falck begins with a decisive refutation of so-called 'post-Saussurean' theory. He points out, as have others, that Saussure's theoretical linguistics entails that language is a closed system - so that discourse cannot have extra-linguistic reference, meaning and truth - only if one confuses the system of language with its use on particular occasions and the methodological constraints upon linguistics with constraints upon language itself. One is grateful to Falck for arguing this so clearly though it is annoying that the present state of literary studies should oblige him to re-state the obvious. His repudiation of system-centred post-Saussurean linguistics does not signal a return to the opposite error of item-centred ('Fido-fido') linguistics, with a one-one relationship between a language composed essentially of names and a pre-formed and pre-formatted extra-linguistic reality. Nevertheless he emphasizes the extent to which linguistic expression is rooted in extra-linguistic reality: discourses owe their particular meanings ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image