PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
PNR266 Now Available
The latest issue of PN Review is now available to read online. read more
Most Read... Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
M. Wynn ThomasThe Other Side of the Hedge
(PN Review 239)
Jamie OsbornIn conversation with Sasha Dugdale
(PN Review 240)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing ‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing
(PN Review 236)
Next Issue Stav Poleg Running Between Languages Jeffrey Meyers on Mr W.H. (Auden) Miles Burrows The Critic as Cleaning Lady Timothy Ades translates Brecht, Karen Leeder translates Ulrike Almut Sandig
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This article is taken from PN Review 171, Volume 33 Number 1, September - October 2006.

The Burning Baby and the Bathwater: Conclusion James Keery

1: ‘Black Magical Bubblings’

The influence of Dylan Thomas, and his involvement with the Apocalypse, can be explained away by judicious selection from a series of axioms:

  1. Thomas is an important poet, but a bad influence on his contemporaries.

  2. Thomas is an unimportant poet, but a bad influence on his contemporaries.

  3. Thomas is an important poet, but his influence has been exaggerated.

  4. Thomas is an unimportant poet whose influence has been exaggerated.

  5. Thomas’s early poetry is Apocalyptic, but in the 1940s it improves.

  6. Thomas’s early poetry is good, but in the 1940s it goes Apocalyptic.

  7. Thomas’s poetry is not Apocalyptic, but neoromantic.

  8. Thomas had nothing to do with the Apocalyptic movement.

My aim in this series of articles has been to dispute these axioms, which at best enliven and at worst bedevil criticism, alongside a similar series, inspired by the need to redeem the decade from guilt by association with the movement:

  1. The Apocalypse was a dead loss, a publicity stunt by wartime opportunists, during a doldrums in English poetry.

  2. The Apocalypse was a dead loss, but at the same time real poets were writing real poetry.

  3. The Apocalypse was a dead loss, but it was all over by 1943, after which attention was refocused onto real poets.

  4. The Apocalypse was a dead loss, but ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image