PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Alberto Manguel Selbstgefühl New poems by Fleur Adcock, Claudine Toutoungi and Tuesday Shannon James Campbell A Walk through the Times Literary Supplement
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This review is taken from PN Review 120, Volume 24 Number 4, March - April 1998.

SHARDS OF MYTH JOHN SMEDS, Statement and Story: Robert Graves's Myth Making (Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press)

The publication of John Smeds's doctoral thesis by Åbo Akademi is a timely one. The fiftieth anniversary of the appearance of Robert Graves's The White Goddess is due to be celebrated in 1998 and will, no doubt, give rise to a flurry of publications on the subject of the book and its influence on the poets and poetry of the latter half of the twentieth century. Fortunately Smeds's success is more than timely.

Critical opinion generally holds that Graves was first and foremost a love poet whose poetry dedicated to real life muses was, to some extent, justified by his loosely academic survey of matriarchal society which he referred to as his 'historical grammar of poetic myth'. His analysis of the goddess's reoccurrence in the myths, songs and poems of various civilisations posits that all 'true' writing reflects 'one story and one story only': that of the birth-death-devouring cycle of the king/poet/ bard and his queen/muse.

Surprisingly, few critics have tested Graves's pre-Goddess works for their consistency to his one-story theory and fewer still have gone on to examine his fictional prose for more than superficial references to proto-Goddess writings. This is where Smeds's work comes in. His analysis of Graves's use of myth is a significant departure from the majority of the existing criticism which tends to rely on biographical evidence to explain the waxing and waning presence of the Goddess in his poetry. Instead, he demonstrates how Graves's thesis evolves from early works ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image