Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This article is taken from PN Review 109, Volume 22 Number 5, May - June 1996.

A Century and its Myths Frederic Raphael

To start with a postscript: this essay is more a meditation than an argument. I say this to avoid any conclusive expectations. My interest is to examine why it is, or at least how it is, that we both do and do not understand our time there is, I suspect, something systematic in this: the future is endurable only if the past can be both digested and - in a sense - excreted, preferably without smell. For example, a fairly unforced reading might say that the creation of the state of Israel, in so far as it was admitted to the world map in 1948 by a fiat on the part of the powers who recognised it (the USA and the USSR en t&ecap;te), was also final notice to Europe's surviving Jews to knock at no other old or new doors. Zionists read as a vindication what others might read as, let us say, a generous ejection. Encouraging the Jews into making territorial claims on the Arabs made sure they would not trouble the conscience of the West. The creation of Israel was, in this light, over-determined: contradictory 'reasons' for things being as they are are not mutually exclusive, even if the desire for heroes or villains tempts the ardent to single-mindedness.

If we now judge the twentieth century a human disaster, we can also be proud of ourselves, a posteriori, precisely for seeing it 'clearly'. By having seen it, we are exempt from having been its ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image