Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Gwyneth Lewis ‘Spiderings’ Ian Thomson ‘Fires were started: Tallinn, 1944’ Adrian May ‘Traditionalism and Tradition’ Judith Herzberg ‘Poems’ translated by Margitt Helbert Horatio Morpurgo ‘What is a Book?’
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 147, Volume 29 Number 1, September - October 2002.

READING NORM SIBUM NORM SIBUM, Girls and Handsome Dogs (The Porcupine's Quill) $14.95

The Muse is increased also by true interpretation
                                         Pindar, Pythia 4

Every once in a while a book of poetry appears that immediately strikes us as remarkable and yet, at least on first perusal, resists our efforts to understand why we like it as much as we do. Such is the case with Norm Sibum's most recent collection, the piquantly titled Girls and Handsome Dogs.

Sibum is one of those poets whose merit eclipses his celebrity and a likely reason for this may be that his work is neither facile in the writing nor easy in the reading. To be sure, there is a degree of surface accessibility in the narrative flow it affects but this is only apparent or deceptive. The poems are constructed as long meandering stories invoking a cast of reflective personae, a peripatetic setting and heaps of cryptic detail, all of which defy ready elucidation. The effect is puzzling because everything seems to fit into its alloted place despite the attendant difficulty of construal.

The method is Pindar's, who is perhaps Sibum's most significant precursor and model. In a standard Pindaric ode, always bewildering at first reading, images and digressions seem unrelated to the subject of the poem or to one another, resembling rather a miscellaneous aggregate of episodes and allusions. The system of aesthetic selection which governs their choice is scarcely detectable. And yet each poem is governed by a symbolic correlative which dictates both the ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image