PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Tim Parksin conversation with Natalia Ginzburg
(PN Review 49)
Next Issue Subha Mukherji Dying and Living with De la Mare Carl Phillips Fall Colors and other poems Alex Wylie The Bureaucratic Sublime: on the secret joys of contemporary poetry Marilyn Hacker Montpeyroux Sonnets David Herman Memories of Raymond Williams
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
PN Review New Issue

This article is taken from PN Review 254, Volume 46 Number 6, July - August 2020.

Pictures from the Rylands Library
51. Portraits and Paradoxes in Marvell’s Miscellaneous Poems (1681)
Stella Halkyard
In appearance, so Aubrey tells us, Andrew Marvell was, ‘pretty strong sett… cherry cheek’t’ with a ‘roundish faced… hazel eie, [and] brown haire’. The Nettleton portrait of Marvell, given by his great nephew Robert Nettleton to the British Museum in 1764, and transferred to the National Portrait Gallery in 1879, appears to bear this out. Replete with luxuriant curls and florid complexion, we can, claims Michael Gearin-Tosh, be ‘reasonably certain’ that this is a true likeness of the poet.

The engraved portrait, which appeared as a frontispiece to the first collected edition of Marvell’s verse, Miscellaneous Poems published posthumously in 1681 (represented here in a drawing by the artist Mary Griffiths), is also deemed to be an ‘honest transcription’ (Richard Brilliant) of the poet’s physiognomy. As an authentic portrait of the author of a book, placed to face its title page, this image works to evoke Marvell’s authorial presence, ‘as though the portrait was intended to speak the text of the book like the source from which it flows’ (Sarah Howe). For some historians author portraits exist to convey the idea that the text ‘is the expression of an individual and gives authority to the work’ (Roger Chartier). In contrast, others insist that ‘the mind, the character, the personality [of an author] are expressed in the poems’ for ‘it is the text of the poems that is the portrait’ (Stephen Orgel). This might suggest that Miscellaneous Poems, the only authentic source for most of Marvell’s poetry (Niall Allsopp), provides the true portrait of our ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image