PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
Digital Access to PN Review
Access the latest issues, plus back issues of PN Review with Exact Editions For PN Review subscribers: to access the PN Review digital archive via the Exact Editions app Exactly or the Exact Editions website, you will first need to know your PN Review ID number. read more
PN Review Prize winners announced
Carcanet Press and PN Review are delighted to announce the winners of the first ever PN Review Prize. read more
Most Read... Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott

(PN Review 235)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Kate BinghamPuddle
(PN Review 236)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue CELEBRATING JOHN ASHBERY Contributors include Mark Ford, Marina Warner, Jeremy Over, Theophilus Kwek, Sam Riviere, Luke Kennard, Philip Terry,Agnes Lehoczky, Emily Critchley, Oli Hazard and others Miles Champion The Gold Standard Rebecca Watts The Cult of the Noble Amateur Marina Tsvetaeva ‘My desire has the features of a woman’: Two Letters translated by Christopher Whyte Iain Bamforth Black and White

This article is taken from PN Review 214, Volume 40 Number 2, November - December 2013.

Vestiges 5: John Cleveland Adam Crothers
Cover of Verse of Cleveland's

Reproduced by permission of the Master and Fellows of St John's College, Cambridge

In 1717, Thomas Baker's long-maintained refusal to accept the overthrow of James II saw him stripped of his St John's fellowship. The books he left to the College refer to Baker, in his hand, as socius ejectus, expelled fellow: there is bitter defiance in preserving for posterity one's disgrace.

Another Johnian, the poet John Cleveland, was beset by damage to his name, damage harder to defy owing to its being posthumous. The 1677 edition of Cleveland's poems, donated by Baker, places much attention upon the 'spurious' attributions that had previously 'usurped' the poet's reputation; annotating the volume elsewhere, Baker observes that the 'intrusted friends' credited with overseeing another edition are, suspiciously, 'not nam'd'.

The critics as well as the compilers were problematic. In 1668, a decade after Cleveland's death, Dryden suggested that catachresis, or 'Clevelandism', was the work of 'un mauvais buffon', and that 'we cannot read a verse of Cleveland's without making a face at it'; in 1779 Johnson would say of the metaphysicals more broadly that the 'modulation' of their poems 'was so imperfect that they were only found to be verses by counting the syllables'.

The insistence upon greater self-discipline, however, has a fuzzy boundary with the demand for conformity. Perhaps, like Baker's, Cleveland's commitments were not to be undercut by popular expectations. His poetry's excess lashes out at the tedium he perceives around ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image