PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Kei Millerthe Fat Black Woman
In Praise of the Fat Black Woman & Volume

(PN Review 241)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Next Issue Beverley Bie Brahic, after Leopardi's 'Broom' Michael Freeman Benefytes and Consolacyons Miles Burrows At Madame Zaza’s and other poems Victoria Kenefick Hunger Strike Hilary Davies Haunted by Christ
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
PNR 250 Poetry Archive Banner
Monthly Carcanet Books
PN Review Blog

This report is taken from PN Review 175, Volume 33 Number 5, May - June 2007.

A Morning Exercise Frank Kuppner

One nondescript Monday morning when I thought I was doing nothing, a refugee sentence slipped into my mind. 'Suddenly, as if at a signal, all the leaves began quivering slightly.' What was this? Where had it come from? Might it be one of the subtle forest phenomena - possibly the herald of a summer shower? - to be found in Turgenev's Sportsman's Sketches, which I had recently been reading? But this is a pure guess. It could have come from anywhere or nowhere.

Still, I thought, now that it's here, what is the least effort one needs to make in order to transform it utterly? Let's see. Change a single letter and at once we reach: 'Suddenly, as if at a signal, all the loaves began quivering slightly.' Loaves, I suppose, need not be much less natural than leaves, particularly if it's early in the day in, say, Montmartre - (ah, Montmartre! I really must see it before one of us packs in!) - but already the sentence is clinging by few or no fingertips to the natural world. Besides which, these are not particularly interesting loaves, are they?

Substitute 'twigs' for 'leaves' and not much changes. However, substitute 'branches' and already it sounds much more uncanny. Go one step further up, to 'trees' - and, a little oddly, it's again less weird, perhaps because 'trees' is interpreted as a general way of referring to leaves and twigs, whereas branches mysteriously insist ...

Searching, please wait... animated waiting image