Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This item is taken from PN Review 272, Volume 49 Number 6, July - August 2023.

Letters to the Editor
Mark Haworth-Booth writes: While I agree with the thrust of Silis McLeod’s article on ‘The Con of the Wild’, [s]he is wrong about Knepp. The rewilding estate is not in ‘rural Suffolk’ but in Sussex. The remark that Knepp ‘is a hybrid between Michael Crichton’s Isla Nublar and a very middle-class Butlins’ is not convincing. I certainly enjoyed a morning walk around Knepp, a year or two ago, seeing white storks and listening to nightingales. Knepp introduced regenerative farming on the estate in 2021 and deserves credit for that too.

Silis MacLeod replies: I would like to thank Mr Haworth-Booth for putting me right about Sussex. He is also correct that regenerative farming should be commended when and wherever it appears. But large-scale rewilding principles – such as those pursued at Knepp – perpetuate, if not tacitly reward, unsustainable and ultimately unjust models of land ownership. (This may be more apparent in Scotland than across the border.) That the ‘estate’ is gaining legitimacy in our modern times is a phenomenon about which we should be wary. After all, these estates were the sites of the socially disatrous agricultural ‘improvements’ in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. 

This item is taken from PN Review 272, Volume 49 Number 6, July - August 2023.



Readers are asked to send a note of any misprints or mistakes that they spot in this item to editor@pnreview.co.uk
Searching, please wait... animated waiting image