PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Mark FordLetters And So It Goes
Letters from Young Mr Grace
(aka John Ashbery)

(PN Review 239)
Henry Kingon Toby Martinez de las Rivas
(PN Review 244)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Jamie OsbornIn conversation with Sasha Dugdale
(PN Review 240)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
OUP PNR 246 Banner
Monthly Carcanet Books
Next Issue Alex Wong embarks on Ausonius's Moselle Christine Blackwell recalls Jonas Mekas Lives of Graves, Trilling and Curnow visited New poems by Lisa Kelly and Jodie Hollander Andy Croft on the 'poetry industry'

This review is taken from PN Review 240, Volume 44 Number 4, March - April 2018.

Cover of Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture
Karl O'HanlonPaying its Way

Evan Kindley, Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture (Harvard University Press) £27.95
Evan Kindley’s succinct book Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture presents a timely and necessary addition to the ongoing conversation in modernist studies surrounding what one of the pioneers in this sub-field, Mark McGurl, describes as modernism’s ‘fall into institutionality’ (p. 409). This scholarship has origins back in Lawrence Rainey’s groundbreaking study Institutions of Modernism, which sought to wrench modernism out of a traditional critical narrative of its claims for the aesthetic autonomy of ‘high’ art, re-contextualising it within a cultural and consumerist economy. Whereas Rainey’s work focused on the wealthy benefactors who became patrons of modernism, and McGurl picks up the story in the 1950s with the emergence of the creative writing programme and the infiltration of the academy by writers, Kindley seeks to account for the transitional period, after the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the Second World War had financially crippled the aristocratic patron class that supported modernism. His antiteleological approach has much in common with revisionist historiography in resisting a determinist account of what may seem from our vantage point the inevitability of literature ensconcing itself within academia: ‘our awareness of where [writers] finally came to settle should not obscure our knowledge of their itinerary’ (p. 10); nevertheless, at times the briskness of this study serves to flatten history’s ‘mesh of nuance, complexity, and contradiction’ (Foster, xvii).

The introduction maps the terrain, with a declaration that ‘this is a book about justification’, the ways in which poet-critics – a hyphenated identity that emerges in the very crucible of the period under ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image