PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
Digital Access to PN Review
Access the latest issues, plus back issues of PN Review with Exact Editions For PN Review subscribers: access the PN Review digital archive via the Exact Editions app Exactly or the Exact Editions website, you will first need to know your PN Review ID number. read more
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Monthly Carcanet Books
Next Issue Thomas Kinsella in conversation Jeffrey Wainwright comes to grips with St Chad Hsien Min Toh gives us a Korean perspective Iain Bamforth on Lou and Fritz: Sensible Shoes meets Starstruck Judith Bishop on Love and Self-Understanding in an Algorythmic Age

This review is taken from PN Review 240, Volume 44 Number 4, March - April 2018.

Cover of Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture
Karl O'HanlonPaying its Way

Evan Kindley, Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture (Harvard University Press) £27.95
Evan Kindley’s succinct book Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture presents a timely and necessary addition to the ongoing conversation in modernist studies surrounding what one of the pioneers in this sub-field, Mark McGurl, describes as modernism’s ‘fall into institutionality’ (p. 409). This scholarship has origins back in Lawrence Rainey’s groundbreaking study Institutions of Modernism, which sought to wrench modernism out of a traditional critical narrative of its claims for the aesthetic autonomy of ‘high’ art, re-contextualising it within a cultural and consumerist economy. Whereas Rainey’s work focused on the wealthy benefactors who became patrons of modernism, and McGurl picks up the story in the 1950s with the emergence of the creative writing programme and the infiltration of the academy by writers, Kindley seeks to account for the transitional period, after the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the Second World War had financially crippled the aristocratic patron class that supported modernism. His antiteleological approach has much in common with revisionist historiography in resisting a determinist account of what may seem from our vantage point the inevitability of literature ensconcing itself within academia: ‘our awareness of where [writers] finally came to settle should not obscure our knowledge of their itinerary’ (p. 10); nevertheless, at times the briskness of this study serves to flatten history’s ‘mesh of nuance, complexity, and contradiction’ (Foster, xvii).

The introduction maps the terrain, with a declaration that ‘this is a book about justification’, the ways in which poet-critics – a hyphenated identity that emerges in the very crucible of the period under ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image