PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
PN Review Prize winners announced
Carcanet Press and PN Review are delighted to announce the winners of the first ever PN Review Prize. read more
Most Read... Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott
1930–2017

(PN Review 235)
Kate BinghamPuddle
(PN Review 236)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue CELEBRATING JOHN ASHBERY Contributors include Mark Ford, Marina Warner, Jeremy Over, Theophilus Kwek, Sam Riviere, Luke Kennard, Philip Terry,Agnes Lehoczky, Emily Critchley, Oli Hazard and others Miles Champion The Gold Standard Rebecca Watts The Cult of the Noble Amateur Marina Tsvetaeva ‘My desire has the features of a woman’: Two Letters translated by Christopher Whyte Iain Bamforth Black and White

This review is taken from PN Review 235, Volume 43 Number 5, May - June 2017.

Cover of The Splash of Words: Believing in Poetry
Rachel MannUnafraid of Mystery Mark Oakley, The Splash of Words: Believing in Poetry
(Canterbury Press, 2016) £12.99

During his final imprisonment, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote of his desire for a new language of faith. He claimed it would be ‘perhaps quite non-religious. But liberating and redeeming as was Jesus’s language. It’ll shock people. It’ll shock them by its power. It’ll be the language of a new truth  […] ’

Bonhoeffer’s words offer one kind of justification for Mark Oakley’s project in The Splash of Words. For Oakley – Canon Chancellor of St Paul’s and, thereby, de facto chief theologian of London’s mother church – wants ‘to believe’ in poetry; the central line of enquiry takes seriously Michael Longley’s words, ‘If I knew where poems came from, I’d go there.’ Oakley’s meditations on thirty more-or-less well-known poems walk a path shadowed by that old nineteenth-century fantasy that ‘Poetry’ might take the weight of the receding ‘Sea of Faith’.

Therein, perhaps, lies the book’s key problem and key interest. In one sense, The Splash of Words lives and dies (and, cheap joke, lives again) by its sincerity. Sincerity may be a virtue for the religious, but it’s rarely a boon for the critic. Thus, Oakley’s assessment of Elizabeth Bishop’s ‘North Haven’ or Louis MacNeice’s ‘Prayer Before Birth’, is a high-wire test of faith. Certainly, Oakley is urbane and a gently gifted critic. Of Bishop’s final offering to Lowell in ‘North Haven’ (‘Sad friend, you cannot change’) Oakley says, ‘[Lowell] slips from view and she puts him at rest […] or is she the sad friend who cannot change her dislocating bereavement?’ Oakley ‘gets’ the tensions ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image