PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
PN Review Prize winners announced
Carcanet Press and PN Review are delighted to announce the winners of the first ever PN Review Prize. read more
Most Read... Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott
1930–2017

(PN Review 235)
Kate BinghamPuddle
(PN Review 236)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue CELEBRATING JOHN ASHBERY Contributors include Mark Ford, Marina Warner, Jeremy Over, Theophilus Kwek, Sam Riviere, Luke Kennard, Philip Terry,Agnes Lehoczky, Emily Critchley, Oli Hazard and others Miles Champion The Gold Standard Rebecca Watts The Cult of the Noble Amateur Marina Tsvetaeva ‘My desire has the features of a woman’: Two Letters translated by Christopher Whyte Iain Bamforth Black and White

This article is taken from PN Review 235, Volume 43 Number 5, May - June 2017.

Translator’s Notebook : 3 (ed. James McGonigal)
III. The Performance of Translation
Edwin Morgan

ON 7 DECEMBER 1956, Edwin Morgan was in Bristol to speak to the University Literary Society on ‘The Translation of Poetry’. The event must have been part of a conference on the work of Alexander Pushkin, for he deliberately addresses the Russian’s work in drama and includes a translation of part of one of his short plays in verse. He had completed this in June 1956, presumably with the conference invitation in mind. Compared with a more theoretical approach in the talk that he had given earlier that year at University College, Keele (see PNR 233), Morgan’s intention now seems to be to combine reflection with public performance, using translations from a range of poets to exemplify different problems faced by the translator. Or we might say that his reflections emerge from the more private process of performing translation. As at Keele, his choice of foreign poets and forms may reveal something of his own inner life. But here we might also sense a reciprocity in the act of translation, where Morgan appears to give back to the foreign poet something of his own language and inventiveness. JAMES MCGONIGAL

THE TRANSLATION OF POETRY1


The first question we have to answer is, Can poetry be translated at all? There has always been a lot of scepticism on this point. It’s expressed, for example, by Shelley in his The Defence of Poetry: ‘Hence the vanity of translation; it were as wise to cast a violet into a crucible […] as seek to transfuse from one language to ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image