PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
Most Read... Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott
1930–2017

(PN Review 235)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Kate BinghamPuddle
(PN Review 236)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Anna JacksonDear Epistle
(PN Review 235)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue Michelle Holmes on ‘Whitman, Alabama’ Les Murray Eight Poems Gabriel Josipovici Who Dares Wins: Reflections on Translation Maureen N. McLane Four Poems James Womack Europe (after the German of Marie Luise Kaschnitz)

This review is taken from PN Review 233, Volume 43 Number 3, January - February 2017.

Cover of Jonathan Ellis (ed), Letter Writing Among Poets: From William Wordsworth to Elizabeth Bishop
Ruth HawthornAn Intercourse with Ghosts
Jonathan Ellis (ed), Letter Writing Among Poets: From William Wordsworth to Elizabeth Bishop Edinburgh University Press, 2016 Reviewed by Ruth Hawthorn
THE DEMISE OF LETTER WRITING has been pronounced prematurely on numerous occasions over the last two centuries; the penny post, telegrams and telephones were all wrongly accused of sounding its death knell. More recently the internet and the ephemeral communication it facilitates has been decried as the final proverbial nail. As one commentator mourns, ‘Inky manuscripts contain insights that can be lost forever to the backspace key.’ While letters may not yet be completely extinct, as Jonathan Ellis observes, ‘However one dates the “great age of letter-writing” there seems little doubt that it is in the past.’ Ending, appropriately, with Ellis’s own haunting essay about the last letters of John Keats, Elizabeth Bishop and Ted Hughes, Letter Writing Among Poets reads as an elegy for the form. What emerges in many of the essays collected here is a sense of letters’ uncanniness, and Kafka’s view of letters as ‘an intercourse with ghosts’ permeates the collection. The absent presence of the letter-writing voice (analogous with the lyric voice) and letters’ ability to vividly recall the voice of the dead is commonly remarked upon, but, Ellis observes, this also works the other way: the addressee ‘is ghostly too’. The necessary lag between writing and reading means that, as Angela Leighton suggests, ‘there is a potential dead letter at the heart of every missive’.

There is some speculation on new media and how the role of letters is being supplanted or transformed in the age of near-instantaneous correspondence. Hermione Lee comments, for example, that ‘No-one ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image