PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
Digital Access to PN Review
Access the latest issues, plus back issues of PN Review with Exact Editions For PN Review subscribers: to access the PN Review digital archive via the Exact Editions app Exactly or the Exact Editions website, you will first need to know your PN Review ID number. read more
Most Read... Rebecca WattsThe Cult of the Noble Amateur
(PN Review 239)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott
1930–2017

(PN Review 235)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue Peter Scupham at 85: a celebration Contributions by Anne Stevenson, Robert Wells, Peter Davidson, Lawrence Sail
Readers are asked to send a note of any misprints or mistakes that they spot in this item to editor@pnreview.co.uk

This item is taken from PN Review 154, Volume 30 Number 2, November - December 2003.

Letters from Mark Beech Wordsworth and Satan

Sir:

Constance Parrish and Duncan Wu (PNR 153) say that Wordsworth's support of Viscount Lonsdale and his sons, Viscount Lowther and Colonel Henry Lowther, in the General Election of 1818, was 'a disgraceful episode, not just in the history of British politics, but in the career of the future Poet Laureate'. It certainly doesn't do Wordsworth much credit: Lonsdale, known throughout the Lake District as the 'bad earl', was portrayed in a cartoon by James Gillray as 'Satan in All His Glory'. But there is a rather important extenuating circumstance. For John Wordsworth, the poet's father, had been Lonsdale's (or, as he then was, Sir James Lowther's) law and land agent; the house in which his son William was born was actually owned by his employer. Wordsworth's allegiance to the Lowthers, though it may seem deeply misguided, was in fact rooted in a sense of longstanding family obligation.

MARK BEECH

Edenbridge

This item is taken from PN Review 154, Volume 30 Number 2, November - December 2003.



Readers are asked to send a note of any misprints or mistakes that they spot in this item to editor@pnreview.co.uk
Searching, please wait... animated waiting image