PN Review Print and Online Poetry Magazine
News and Notes
Digital Access to PN Review
Access the latest issues, plus back issues of PN Review with Exact Editions For PN Review subscribers: to access the PN Review digital archive via the Exact Editions app Exactly or the Exact Editions website, you will first need to know your PN Review ID number. read more
PN Review Prize winners announced
Carcanet Press and PN Review are delighted to announce the winners of the first ever PN Review Prize. read more
Most Read... Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Drew MilneTom Raworth’s Writing
‘present past improved’: Tom Raworth’s Writing

(PN Review 236)
Alejandro Fernandez-OsorioPomace (trans. James Womack)
(PN Review 236)
Kei MillerIn the Shadow of Derek Walcott
1930–2017

(PN Review 235)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Kate BinghamPuddle
(PN Review 236)
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Gratis Ad 1
Gratis Ad 2
Next Issue CELEBRATING JOHN ASHBERY Contributors include Mark Ford, Marina Warner, Jeremy Over, Theophilus Kwek, Sam Riviere, Luke Kennard, Philip Terry,Agnes Lehoczky, Emily Critchley, Oli Hazard and others Miles Champion The Gold Standard Rebecca Watts The Cult of the Noble Amateur Marina Tsvetaeva ‘My desire has the features of a woman’: Two Letters translated by Christopher Whyte Iain Bamforth Black and White

This report is taken from PN Review 237, Volume 44 Number 1, September - October 2017.

Letter from South Korea (II) David Miller
THERE IS A PROBLEM on the Korean peninsula, not necessarily a military one. It concerns the pundits who come to this place with their eyes shut, conditioned by cardboard cut-out interpretations of history. Missing from images of this peninsula are Korean voices themselves. No one even wants to listen in the first place. Unreflecting commentary can betray more about the ignorance of reporters than about Korea. ‘The only thing both Koreas share,’ proclaimed ITV’s John Irvine in April, reporting from a subway station in Seoul, ‘is their last name’. As if a shared language and thousands of years of history mean nothing next to an arbitrarily demarcated partition.

To dismiss Korea as a unified territory equally dismisses the hopes of its inhabitants. Even if the younger generation cite potential economic problems as a reason to avoid reunification, there is also much evidence to the contrary. When Korea was forcibly partitioned more negotiations were promised in ninety days. This never happened. The serious attempts by writers in both countries to compile a collaborative Korean dictionary are testament to a desire for this stalled reunification as much as they are signs of separation. Recently, statements like Irvine’s have reached saturation point, coupled as they always are with speculative accounts of military prowess. To an active, mindful, existence here, they lend surreal qualities. There are tensions, but little justice is done by the reductions of twenty-four-hour news.

Commentary that comes from this region must pay attention to the omissions and silences. One of the most engaging pundits has ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image